Kompleksitas Kepemimpinan Kristen Antargenerasi Dalam Konteks Kontemporer
Abstract
The main objective of this work is to show the complexity of intergenerational leadership in a contemporary context. Through indepth research and analyzing differences and similarities between different generations in terms of views, values, and attitudes, as well as identifying effective strategies and approaches to address these challenges. This research also aims to identify key factors influencing dynamics between different generations and formulate approaches that can be used to address new challenges. This research looks at generational differences not only from the perspective of conflict but also from the perspective of working together and using different values to achieve common goals. In this study, literature studies and journals were used as methods related to the analysis of relevant and current literature on intergenerational Christian leadership issues. This approach enables a deep understanding of the complexities and dynamics that exist in the context of intergenerational Christian leadership in the current situation. In discussing the leadership gap between generations in the contemporary context, it does not escape to talk about generation theory and transformational leadership theory. Generation theory and transformational leadership theory are the link and can be the answer to the leadership gap between today's generations. It is undeniable that there are differences in the opinions of the older generation about the younger generation and vice versa in the opinions of the younger generation about the older generation, causing tensions and solutions to the problem. The critical point of human interaction is related to the basic ideas, life goals, ambitions, and beliefs of the transformational leader, who will be able to bring change to the people he leads so as to bring change in serving better, holding fast to the values of truth, and encouraging and inspiring others to have confidence when working or serving and being in the life of Christ.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). "Transformational Leadership". Psychology Press.
_________., Bass & Stodgill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, 3rd ed. (New York: The Free Press, 1990).
_________., Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectation (New York: The Free Press, 1985).
Burns, J. M., Leadership (New York: Harper & Row, 1978).
Carlson., Dawn S. and Pamela L. Perrewe, “Institutionalization of Organizational Ethics Through Transformational Leadership,” Journal of Business Ethics 14, no. 10 (1995): 829–38, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872349.
Downton, J.V. Rebel., Leadership: Commitment And Charisma In a Revolutionary Process (New York: Free Press, 1973).
Gomes., A Rui, “Transformational Leadership: Theory, Research, and Application To Sport,” 2007
Hanan, Djayadi., (2018). Berebut Milenial, Kompas ID, 28 Agustus, 2018.
Harsoyo, Ronny., Teori Kepemimpinan Transformasional Bernard M. Bass dan Aplikasinya Dalam Peningkatan Mutu Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education Management Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022),pp 247-262 http://sajiem.iainponorogo.ac.id/sajiem
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). "Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation". Vintage.
___________., (2007). "The Fourth Turning: What the Cycles of History Tell Us About America's Next Rendezvous with Destiny". Broadway Books.
https://www.intipesan.com/memahami-sikap-idealis-pada-generasi-millenial/
https://www.kemenkopmk.go.id/generasi-muda-perlu-penguatan-karakter-adaptif
Hughes, R. L., and Et.al., Leadership: Enhancing The Lesson Of Experience, 5th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006)
Kobstan, Heintje Barry., KEPEMIMPINAN GEREJA YANG KOLABORATIF DAN ADAPTIF DALAM MENGATASI KESENJANGAN ANTARA GENERASI TUA DAN GENERASI MUDA DI ERA DIGITAL. https://jurnal.sttii-bali.ac.id/index.php/JTP/article/view/75/70
Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). "Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069". Harper Perennial.
Yukl, G., “An Evaluation of Conceptual Weaknesses In Transformational And Charismatic Leadership,” The Leadership Quarterly 10, no. 2 (1999): 285–305.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62042/jtp.v5i2.81
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.